Alison Piper

459 citations
12 papers · 291 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Alison Piper

11 papers receiving 215 citations

Peers

Alison Piper
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Language and Linguistics 67
  • Literature and Literary Theory 55
  • Applied Psychology 17
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 40
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 32
Replace Gustav W. Friedrich with:
Gustav W. Friedrich United States
Klaus Foppa Switzerland
James Raths United States
Anna Volodina Germany
Adrienne Alton‐Lee New Zealand
Tim Cole United States
Hakan Karataş Türkiye
Kenneth K. Sereno United States
James A. Keaten United States
John O'Neil United States
Alison Piper relative to Gustav W. Friedrich United States Gustav W. Friedrich's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Gustav W. Friedrich · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Alison Piper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Alison Piper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alison Piper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alison Piper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Alison Piper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alison Piper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alison Piper. The network helps show where Alison Piper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside Alison Piper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Alison Piper Line = papers co-authored together Alison Piper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 1987152
2 198638
3 200031
4 199819
5 198714
6 199710
7 20006
8 20156
9 19896
10 19945
11 19953
12
Some Have Credit Cards and Others Have Giro Cheques: A Study of New Labour's 'Individuals' and 'People' as Lifelong Learners in Late Modernity. Occasional Papers.
20001

About Alison Piper

Alison Piper is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Language and Linguistics, Education, Clinical Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 12 papers that have together received 291 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (6 papers), Second Language Learning and Teaching (4 papers), Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (2 papers), Global Educational Policies and Reforms (1 paper), Child Therapy and Development (1 paper), Library Science and Information Literacy (1 paper), Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (1 paper) and Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Language and Linguistics (67 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (55 citations), Applied Psychology (17 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (40 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (32 citations). Alison Piper has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ellen J. Langer, Su White and Wendy Hall. Their work appears in journals such as System, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Language Teaching Research, Language Awareness and Library & Information Science Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact