Alison E. Post

1.2k citations
31 papers · 831 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Alison E. Post

27 papers receiving 736 citations

Peers

Alison E. Post
Comparison fields: 5 of 127
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 159
  • Biological Psychiatry 82
  • Urban Studies 112
  • Development 43
  • Political Science and International Relations 254
Replace Ailsa McKay with:
Ailsa McKay United Kingdom
James L. Creighton United States
William Hobbs United States
Catherine Owen United Kingdom
Jaquelyn L. Jahn United States
Phil Brown United Kingdom
Catherine Bromley United Kingdom
Lucy Natarajan United Kingdom
Stéphanie Fox Canada
Alison E. Post relative to Ailsa McKay United Kingdom Ailsa McKay's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×14.3×
Ailsa McKay · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Alison E. Post

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Alison E. Post's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alison E. Post with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alison E. Post more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Alison E. Post

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alison E. Post. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alison E. Post. The network helps show where Alison E. Post may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Alison E. Post, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Alison E. Post Line = papers co-authored together Alison E. Post links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1987351
2 201469
3 201760
4 201853
5 201851
6 201450
7 201431
8 201827
9 201526
10 201422
11 201721
12 201617
13 202210
14 20188
15 20138
16 20147
17 20194
18 20083
19
How a Law Stays a Law: The Durability of U.S. Tax Breaks, 1967-2003
20053
20 20192

About Alison E. Post

Alison E. Post is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Economics and Econometrics, Urban Studies, Strategy and Management and Public Administration, having authored 31 papers that have together received 831 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Local Government Finance and Decentralization (8 papers), Urban and Rural Development Challenges (6 papers), Water Governance and Infrastructure (6 papers), Public-Private Partnership Projects (4 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (3 papers), Taxation and Compliance Studies (3 papers), Public Policy and Administration Research (3 papers) and State Capitalism and Financial Governance (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (159 citations), Biological Psychiatry (82 citations), Urban Studies (112 citations), Development (43 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (254 citations). Alison E. Post has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Sudan and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Veronica Herrera, Ronald Glaser, Carl E. Speicher, Mark Kotur, Melinda A. Beck, Janice K. Kiecolt‐Glaser, David J. Pinsky, John Rice, Richard H. Fertel and Julie C. Stout. Their work appears in journals such as World Development, Perspectives on Politics, Studies in Comparative International Development, Governance and Politics & Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact