Alison E. Post

23 papers receiving 650 citations

Peers

Alison E. Post
Comparison fields: 5 of 128
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 146
  • Biological Psychiatry 74
  • Urban Studies 92
  • Development 33
  • Political Science and International Relations 207
Replace William Hobbs with:
William Hobbs United States
Catherine Owen United Kingdom
Emily Conover United States
Bernard Steunenberg Netherlands
Jaquelyn L. Jahn United States
Yvonne Hartman Netherlands
David Howell United Kingdom
Harry Burns United Kingdom
Alison E. Post relative to William Hobbs United States William Hobbs's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×40×48.7×
William Hobbs · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Alison E. Post

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Alison E. Post's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alison E. Post with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alison E. Post more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Alison E. Post

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alison E. Post. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alison E. Post. The network helps show where Alison E. Post may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Alison E. Post, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Alison E. Post Line = papers co-authored together Alison E. Post links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1987311
2 201458
3 201751
4 201844
5 201840
6 201433
7 201427
8 201824
9 201421
10 201720
11 201616
12 201513
13 202210
14 20147
15 20187
16 20083
17
How a Law Stays a Law: The Durability of U.S. Tax Breaks, 1967-2003
20053
18 20192
19 20102
20
Broad-Based Consumer Subsidies as 'Policy Traps': The Case of Utilities Subsidies in Post-Crisis Argentina
20121

About Alison E. Post

Alison E. Post is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management, Urban Studies and Public Administration, having authored 25 papers that have together received 696 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Local Government Finance and Decentralization (7 papers), Urban and Rural Development Challenges (5 papers), Public-Private Partnership Projects (4 papers), Water Governance and Infrastructure (4 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (3 papers), Public Policy and Administration Research (3 papers), Taxation and Compliance Studies (3 papers) and State Capitalism and Financial Governance (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (146 citations), Biological Psychiatry (74 citations), Urban Studies (92 citations), Development (33 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (207 citations). Alison E. Post has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Sudan and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Veronica Herrera, Mark Kotur, Melinda A. Beck, Richard H. Fertel, Carl E. Speicher, Janice K. Kiecolt‐Glaser, David J. Pinsky, John Rice, Julie C. Stout and Ronald Glaser. Their work appears in journals such as Studies in Comparative International Development, World Development, Perspectives on Politics, Governance and Environment and Planning B Urban Analytics and City Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact