David Howell

64 papers receiving 812 citations

Peers

David Howell
Comparison fields: 5 of 127
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 125
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 66
  • Political Science and International Relations 211
  • Pharmacy 33
  • Clinical Psychology 145
Replace Alexander Rushforth with:
Alexander Rushforth Netherlands
David Mitchell United States
Mark Elam Sweden
Olav Muurlink Australia
David Robertson United Kingdom
Brian O’Connell United States
Peter Davis United Kingdom
Carl E. Schneider United States
James R. Zetka United States
Mara Gorli Italy
David Howell relative to Alexander Rushforth Netherlands Alexander Rushforth's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.1×
Alexander Rushforth · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Howell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Howell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Howell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Howell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Howell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Howell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Howell. The network helps show where David Howell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Howell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Howell Line = papers co-authored together David Howell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 79 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009131
2
Identifying clinical and acute psychological risk factors for PTSD after critical care: a systematic review.
2013127
3 1980118
4 199083
5 202054
6 201252
7 198949
8 200548
9 198632
10 201829
11 201427
12 198827
13 200218
14 201817
15 200214
16 197714
17
A journey from Aleppo to Jerusalem in 1697
196312
18 198710
19 20198
20 20128

About David Howell

David Howell is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, History and Strategy and Management, having authored 79 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political and Economic history of UK and US (13 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (8 papers), Knowledge Management and Sharing (4 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (4 papers), French Historical and Cultural Studies (3 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (3 papers), Australian History and Society (3 papers) and Health and Well-being Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (125 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (66 citations), Political Science and International Relations (211 citations), Pharmacy (33 citations) and Clinical Psychology (145 citations). David Howell has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Rainer Seidel, Charlotta Windahl, Dorothy Wade, Michael G. Mythen, Rebecca Hardy, James C. Rosen, Carl H. Landé, James C. Scott, Catherine Ann Cline and James Naylor. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, BMJ Open, Contemporary British History, Journal of Interprofessional Care and Labour / Le Travail.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact