Alisa Powers

1.9k citations
7 papers · 928 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Alisa Powers

7 papers receiving 919 citations

Peers

Alisa Powers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 205
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 426
  • General Decision Sciences 40
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 248
  • Clinical Psychology 346
Replace Kazufumi Omura with:
Kazufumi Omura Japan
Marieke Bos Netherlands
Jennifer N. Bress United States
Anja S. Euser Netherlands
Sandra Jazbec United States
Allison L. Jahn United States
Estíbaliz Arce United States
James May United States
Kristen L. Mackiewicz United States
Sara M. Levens United States
Alisa Powers relative to Kazufumi Omura Japan Kazufumi Omura's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Kazufumi Omura · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Alisa Powers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Alisa Powers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alisa Powers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alisa Powers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Alisa Powers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alisa Powers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alisa Powers. The network helps show where Alisa Powers may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Alisa Powers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Alisa Powers Line = papers co-authored together Alisa Powers links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
#Work
1 2012312
2 2016180
3 2015114
4 2015101
5 201494
6 201666
7 201461

About Alisa Powers

Alisa Powers is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Behavioral Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 7 papers that have together received 928 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (3 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (3 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (3 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (2 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (1 paper), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (1 paper), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (1 paper) and Eating Disorders and Behaviors (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (205 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (426 citations), General Decision Sciences (40 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (248 citations) and Clinical Psychology (346 citations). Alisa Powers has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and China. Frequent co-authors include B.J. Casey, Erika J. Ruberry, Natasha Mehta, Walter Mischel, Peter Franz, Jochen Weber, Kevin N. Ochsner, Jennifer A. Silvers, Catherine Insel and Rebecca Martin. Their work appears in journals such as Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Cerebral Cortex, Psychological Science and Journal of Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact