Ali Marsh
Impact in
- Toxicology top 10%
- Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Psychedelics and Drug Studies
Papers in
-
- Community Health and Development 3
- Health Policy Implementation Science 2
- Homelessness and Social Issues 2
-
- Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes 3
- HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk 2
- Co-authors
- Leigh M. Smith (3 shared papers)Clare S. Rees (1 shared paper)Mark Craigie (1 shared paper)Paula R. Nathan (1 shared paper)Bill Saunders (3 shared papers)Jan P. Piek (2 shared papers)Brian Bishop (3 shared papers)Stephen Bright (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- Educational and Psychological Measurement (2 papers)Australian Psychologist (2 papers)Addiction Research & Theory (2 papers)Drug and Alcohol Review (2 papers)Mortality (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- Australia
In The Last Decade
Ali Marsh
12 papers receiving 242 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Toxicology 25
- Clinical Psychology 141
- Applied Psychology 33
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 61
- Social Psychology 65
Countries citing papers authored by Ali Marsh
This map shows the geographic impact of Ali Marsh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ali Marsh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ali Marsh more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ali Marsh
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ali Marsh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ali Marsh. The network helps show where Ali Marsh may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 15 scholars most cited alongside Ali Marsh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2008 | 79 | |
| 2 | 2003 | 65 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 40 | |
| 4 | 2008 | 28 | |
| 5 | 2009 | 23 | |
| 6 | 2005 | 13 | |
| 7 | 2003 | 6 | |
| 8 | 2007 | 3 | |
| 9 | 2005 | 2 | |
| 10 | 2000 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 2 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 2 | |
| 13 | Workers and harm reduction: who's using what and why: a cross-sectional survey of metropolitan youth workers in Western Australia | 1999 | 1 |
| 14 | 1999 | 1 |
About Ali Marsh
Ali Marsh is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Epidemiology, Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Applied Psychology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 267 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (3 papers), Community Health and Development (3 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (2 papers), HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (2 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (2 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (1 paper) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (25 citations), Clinical Psychology (141 citations), Applied Psychology (33 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (61 citations) and Social Psychology (65 citations). Ali Marsh has collaborated with scholars based in Australia. Frequent co-authors include Leigh M. Smith, Clare S. Rees, Mark Craigie, Paula R. Nathan, Bill Saunders, Jan P. Piek, Brian Bishop, Stephen Bright, Monica J. Barratt and Robert Kane. Their work appears in journals such as Educational and Psychological Measurement, Australian Psychologist, Addiction Research & Theory, Drug and Alcohol Review and Mortality.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.