Brian Bishop

25 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Brian Bishop
Comparison fields: 5 of 125
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 348
  • Marketing 242
  • General Decision Sciences 47
  • Applied Psychology 110
  • Clinical Psychology 264
Replace Jennifer Boldero with:
Jennifer Boldero Australia
Renée J. Bator United States
Wencke Gwozdz Denmark
Jack Arbuthnot United States
Stephen Wu United States
John Paul Schott United States
Richard Osbaldiston United States
Cameron Brick Netherlands
Alexander Maki United States
José‐Julián Escario Spain
Brian Bishop relative to Jennifer Boldero Australia Jennifer Boldero's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Jennifer Boldero · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Brian Bishop

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Brian Bishop's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brian Bishop with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brian Bishop more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Brian Bishop

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brian Bishop. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brian Bishop. The network helps show where Brian Bishop may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Brian Bishop, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Brian Bishop Line = papers co-authored together Brian Bishop links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013366
2 1999187
3 2003122
4 2014101
5 201486
6 200981
7 200078
8 200456
9 200323
10 202020
11 201617
12 199516
13 200016
14 201616
15 201512
16 201211
17
Social change in rural settings: lessons for community change agents
199210
18
Aboriginal Concepts of Place and Country and their Meaning in Mental Health
20147
19 19906
20 20046

About Brian Bishop

Brian Bishop is a scholar working on Education, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Applied Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 26 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (3 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (3 papers), Disability Rights and Representation (3 papers), Housing Market and Economics (3 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (2 papers) and Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (348 citations), Marketing (242 citations), General Decision Sciences (47 citations), Applied Psychology (110 citations) and Clinical Psychology (264 citations). Brian Bishop has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Netherlands and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Lucy Chan, Geoffrey J. Syme, Bradley S. Jorgensen, Robert Kane, Clare Roberts, Blair E. Nancarrow, Bret Hart, Lynne D. Roberts, Jennifer Price and Zoe Leviston. Their work appears in journals such as Australian Psychologist, Journal of Economic Psychology, Frontiers in Psychology, Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part A and Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact