This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Mortality. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Mortality with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mortality more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Mortality. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Mortality.
About Mortality
The 893 papers published in Mortality in the last decades have received a total of 9.2k indexed citations . Papers published in Mortality usually cover Clinical Psychology (469 papers), Anthropology (114 papers), Geography, Planning and Development (53 papers), Health (65 papers) and Philosophy (79 papers) specifically the topics of Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (435 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (145 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (80 papers), Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration (67 papers), Anthropological Studies and Insights (67 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (50 papers), Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (44 papers) and Patient Dignity and Privacy (41 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Mortality are Tony Walter, Liz Rolls, Julie Rugg, Kate Bennett, Kate Woodthorpe, David Clark, Margaret Gibson, Gordon Riches, Allan Kellehear and Eva Reimers.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.