Aidan Gray

16 papers receiving 360 citations

Peers

Aidan Gray
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Biological Psychiatry 107
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 63
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 79
  • History and Philosophy of Science 27
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 80
Replace Wolfgang Klosterhalfen with:
Wolfgang Klosterhalfen Germany
Grant McQueen United Kingdom
Qinyu Lv China
Raya Lapidus Israel
Douglas Blackwood United Kingdom
João V. Nani Brazil
Vibeke Nielsen Denmark
Magnus Lekman Sweden
H. Silva Chile
Juan Antonio García-Carmona Spain
Aidan Gray relative to Wolfgang Klosterhalfen Germany Wolfgang Klosterhalfen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×40×45×
Wolfgang Klosterhalfen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Aidan Gray

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Aidan Gray's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Aidan Gray with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Aidan Gray more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Aidan Gray

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Aidan Gray. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Aidan Gray. The network helps show where Aidan Gray may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Aidan Gray, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Aidan Gray Line = papers co-authored together Aidan Gray links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 2015188
2 201152
3 201031
4 201325
5 201716
6 201710
7 202010
8 20159
9 20178
10 20148
11 20184
12 20204
13 20213
14 20241
15
Are the cardiovascular risk reductions seen with empagliflozin in the EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial explained by conventional cardiovascular risk factors?
20171
16 20181
17 20240

About Aidan Gray

Aidan Gray is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science, Language and Linguistics and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 17 papers that have together received 371 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (11 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (6 papers), Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (5 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (5 papers), Diabetes Treatment and Management (3 papers), Pancreatic function and diabetes (2 papers), Diabetes Management and Research (2 papers) and Natural Language Processing Techniques (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (107 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (63 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (79 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (27 citations) and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (80 citations). Aidan Gray has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Amy Deep‐Soboslay, Thomas M. Hyde, Monsheel Sodhi, Joel E. Kleinman, J H Holcombe, Jolene Kay Berg, Sylvia Shenouda, Cory R. Heilmann, Rachel Goodman and J. Han. Their work appears in journals such as Noûs, Synthese, Diabetic Medicine, Mind and Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact