Adèle de Jager
Impact in
- Speech and Hearing top 2%
- Digital Storytelling and Education
- Conservation top 5%
- Art Therapy and Mental Health
Papers in
-
- Mental Health and Patient Involvement 3
-
- Participatory Visual Research Methods 5
- Co-authors
- Katherine Boydell (6 shared papers)Andrea Susan Fogarty (1 shared paper)Caroline Lenette (1 shared paper)Paul Rhodes (2 shared papers)Vanessa Beavan (2 shared papers)Simon McCarthy‐Jones (1 shared paper)Neil Thomas (1 shared paper)Mark Hayward (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Qualitative Health Research (1 paper)Forum qualitative Sozialforschung (1 paper)The Qualitative Report (1 paper)Clinical Psychologist (1 paper)Psychosis (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaNew ZealandUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Adèle de Jager
10 papers receiving 370 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- Speech and Hearing 81
- Conservation 12
- General Health Professions 54
- Sociology and Political Science 121
- Psychiatry and Mental health 41
Countries citing papers authored by Adèle de Jager
This map shows the geographic impact of Adèle de Jager's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Adèle de Jager with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Adèle de Jager more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Adèle de Jager
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Adèle de Jager. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Adèle de Jager. The network helps show where Adèle de Jager may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 18 scholars most cited alongside Adèle de Jager, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 141 | |
| 2 | 2015 | 122 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 53 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 20 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 20 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 20 | |
| 7 | A New Zealand Regression Formula for Premorbid Estimation Using the National Adult Reading Test | 2011 | 5 |
| 8 | 2020 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2022 | 1 |
About Adèle de Jager
Adèle de Jager is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Speech and Hearing, Conservation and Applied Psychology, having authored 10 papers that have together received 390 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Participatory Visual Research Methods (5 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (3 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (1 paper), Historical and Modern Theater Studies (1 paper), Hallucinations in medical conditions (1 paper), Digital Storytelling and Education (1 paper), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (1 paper) and Psychological Testing and Assessment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Speech and Hearing (81 citations), Conservation (12 citations), General Health Professions (54 citations), Sociology and Political Science (121 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (41 citations). Adèle de Jager has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, New Zealand and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Katherine Boydell, Andrea Susan Fogarty, Caroline Lenette, Paul Rhodes, Vanessa Beavan, Simon McCarthy‐Jones, Neil Thomas, Mark Hayward, Kathryn McCabe and Debra Lampshire. Their work appears in journals such as Qualitative Health Research, Forum qualitative Sozialforschung, The Qualitative Report, Clinical Psychologist and Psychosis.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.