A.C. Moffat
Impact in
- Toxicology top 0.2%
- Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
- Analytical Chemistry top 0.5%
- Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals
Papers in
- Spectroscopy 37
- Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography 33
- Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications 12
-
- Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals 17
- Co-authors
- R. Gill (15 shared papers)A H Beckett (7 shared papers)A.H. Stead (10 shared papers)Pamela Williams (6 shared papers)K.W. Smalldon (1 shared paper)Laurence J. King (9 shared papers)Brian K. Law (9 shared papers)GT Tucker (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Chromatography A (22 papers)Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology (11 papers)The Analyst (3 papers)Chromatographia (2 papers)Science & Justice (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesMexico
In The Last Decade
A.C. Moffat
89 papers receiving 2.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 150
- Toxicology 436
- Analytical Chemistry 696
- Spectroscopy 1.1k
- Pharmacology 486
- Pharmaceutical Science 136
Countries citing papers authored by A.C. Moffat
This map shows the geographic impact of A.C. Moffat's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A.C. Moffat with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A.C. Moffat more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by A.C. Moffat
This network shows the impact of papers produced by A.C. Moffat. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A.C. Moffat. The network helps show where A.C. Moffat may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside A.C. Moffat, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 91 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1973 | 149 | |
| 2 | 1967 | 149 | |
| 3 | 1983 | 143 | |
| 4 | 1975 | 110 | |
| 5 | 1982 | 92 | |
| 6 | 1983 | 90 | |
| 7 | 1980 | 87 | |
| 8 | 1989 | 86 | |
| 9 | 1984 | 80 | |
| 10 | 1982 | 75 | |
| 11 | 1982 | 71 | |
| 12 | 1999 | 64 | |
| 13 | Therapeutic uses of cannabis | 1997 | 57 |
| 14 | 1984 | 54 | |
| 15 | 1969 | 52 | |
| 16 | 1984 | 50 | |
| 17 | 1975 | 50 | |
| 18 | 1972 | 48 | |
| 19 | 1978 | 45 | |
| 20 | 1984 | 43 |
About A.C. Moffat
A.C. Moffat is a scholar working on Spectroscopy, Analytical Chemistry, Pharmacology, Toxicology and Molecular Biology, having authored 91 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (33 papers), Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals (17 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (14 papers), Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (14 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (12 papers), Poisoning and overdose treatments (8 papers), Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications (6 papers) and Analytical Chemistry and Sensors (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (436 citations), Analytical Chemistry (696 citations), Spectroscopy (1.1k citations), Pharmacology (486 citations) and Pharmaceutical Science (136 citations). A.C. Moffat has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include R. Gill, A H Beckett, A.H. Stead, Pamela Williams, K.W. Smalldon, Laurence J. King, Brian K. Law, GT Tucker, E. C. Horning and P A Mason. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Chromatography A, Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, The Analyst, Chromatographia and Science & Justice.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.