This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Theater. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Theater with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Theater more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Theater. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Theater.
About Theater
The 479 papers published in Theater in the last decades have received a total of 829 indexed citations . Papers published in Theater usually cover Visual Arts and Performing Arts (211 papers), Music (34 papers), Philosophy (36 papers), Cultural Studies (26 papers) and Literature and Literary Theory (31 papers) specifically the topics of Theatre and Performance Studies (202 papers), Cultural Studies and Interdisciplinary Research (25 papers), Theater, Performance, and Music History (23 papers), Irish and British Studies (18 papers), Cinema and Media Studies (16 papers), Arts, Culture, and Music Studies (14 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (13 papers) and Eastern European Communism and Reforms (13 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Theater are Una Chaudhuri, Jacques Derrida, Rustom Bharucha, Alisa Solomon, Elinor Fuchs, Sarah Bay‐Cheng, Jack Zipes, Thomas F. DeFrantz, Laurence Senelick and Jonathan Marks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.