Countries where authors publish in Postmodern Culture
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Postmodern Culture. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Postmodern Culture with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Postmodern Culture more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Postmodern Culture. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Postmodern Culture.
About Postmodern Culture
The 524 papers published in Postmodern Culture in the last decades have received a total of 1.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Postmodern Culture usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (131 papers), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (54 papers), Music (31 papers), Cultural Studies (70 papers) and Philosophy (96 papers) specifically the topics of Contemporary Literature and Criticism (52 papers), Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (44 papers), Psychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics (39 papers), Digital Games and Media (33 papers), Cinema and Media Studies (31 papers), Music History and Culture (24 papers), Poetry Analysis and Criticism (19 papers) and Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (19 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Postmodern Culture are bell hooks, Marie‐Laure Ryan, Mark B. N. Hansen, Andrew Ross, Stuart Moulthrop, Søren Bro Pold, Christopher Douglas, N. Katherine Hayles, David Cowart and Scott Herring.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.