The Musical Quarterly

1.3k papers and 3.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.3k papers published in The Musical Quarterly in the last decades have received a total of 3.7k indexed citations. Papers published in The Musical Quarterly usually cover Music (852 papers), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (136 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (89 papers) specifically the topics of Musicology and Musical Analysis (740 papers), Diverse Musicological Studies (259 papers) and Music History and Culture (222 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Musical Quarterly are Bruno Nettl, Patrick J. Smith, Milton Babbitt, Charles Seeger, Theodor W. Adorno, David Huron, Leon Botstein, Emily Thompson, Leo Treitler and Allen Forte.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Musical Quarterly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Musical Quarterly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Musical Quarterly.

Countries where authors publish in The Musical Quarterly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Musical Quarterly. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Musical Quarterly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Musical Quarterly more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025