Contemporary European History

849 papers and 3.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 849 papers published in Contemporary European History in the last decades have received a total of 3.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Contemporary European History usually cover Political Science and International Relations (458 papers), Sociology and Political Science (431 papers) and History (309 papers) specifically the topics of European history and politics (214 papers), Historical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics (138 papers) and French Historical and Cultural Studies (120 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Contemporary European History are Patricia Clavin, Peter Temin, Barry Eichengreen, Pierre‐Yves Saunier, Ian Kershaw, Kiran Klaus Patel, Paul Ginsborg, Rosario Forlenza, Antoine Vion and N. Piers Ludlow.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Contemporary European History

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Contemporary European History. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Contemporary European History.

Countries where authors publish in Contemporary European History

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Contemporary European History. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Contemporary European History with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Contemporary European History more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025