The Jewish Quarterly Review

1.4k papers and 5.0k indexed citations

About

The 1.4k papers published in The Jewish Quarterly Review in the last decades have received a total of 5.0k indexed citations. Papers published in The Jewish Quarterly Review usually cover Sociology and Political Science (700 papers), Religious studies (543 papers) and Archeology (525 papers) specifically the topics of Biblical Studies and Interpretation (515 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (446 papers) and Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (320 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Jewish Quarterly Review are Solomon Zeitlin, Moshe Weinfeld, Daniel Boyarín, Stefan C. Reif, Lloyd Gaston, C. H. Dodd, Mark S. Smith, William Chester Jordan, Leon Nemoy and O. Neugebauer.

In The Last Decade

The Jewish Quarterly Review

757 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Fields of papers published in The Jewish Quarterly Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Jewish Quarterly Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Jewish Quarterly Review.

Countries where authors publish in The Jewish Quarterly Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Jewish Quarterly Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Jewish Quarterly Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Jewish Quarterly Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026