Countries where authors publish in The Jewish Quarterly Review
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Jewish Quarterly Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Jewish Quarterly Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Jewish Quarterly Review more than expected).
Fields of papers published in The Jewish Quarterly Review
This network shows the impact of papers published in The Jewish Quarterly Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Jewish Quarterly Review.
About The Jewish Quarterly Review
The 1.5k papers published in The Jewish Quarterly Review in the last decades have received a total of 10.0k indexed citations . Papers published in The Jewish Quarterly Review usually cover Religious studies (577 papers), Archeology (572 papers), Philosophy (297 papers), Sociology and Political Science (762 papers) and History (144 papers) specifically the topics of Biblical Studies and Interpretation (549 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (486 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (353 papers), Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (345 papers), Medieval and Classical Philosophy (238 papers), Jewish Identity and Society (136 papers), Islamic Studies and History (95 papers) and Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (93 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Jewish Quarterly Review are Solomon Zeitlin, Louis H. Feldman, Moshe Weinfeld, Stefan C. Reif, Daniel Boyarín, William Chester Jordan, Shaye J. D. Cohen, Daniel R. Schwartz, Daniel J. Lasker and Jérémy Cohen.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.