This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Terrain. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Terrain with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Terrain more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Terrain. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Terrain.
About Terrain
The 747 papers published in Terrain in the last decades have received a total of 3.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Terrain usually cover History and Philosophy of Science (67 papers), Cultural Studies (104 papers), Archeology (120 papers), Anthropology (105 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (348 papers) specifically the topics of French Urban and Social Studies (190 papers), Cultural Identity and Heritage (110 papers), Diverse Cultural and Historical Studies (82 papers), Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (63 papers), Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender (55 papers), Education, sociology, and vocational training (45 papers), African Studies and Ethnography (44 papers) and Agriculture and Rural Development Research (41 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Terrain are Gérard Lenclud, Éric Fassin, Alban Bensa, Geneviève Pruvost, David C. Berliner, Gérard Althabe, Christian Bromberger, Daniel Fabre, Maurice Bloch and Jacques Pélegrin.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.