Countries where authors publish in Visual Anthropology Review
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Visual Anthropology Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Visual Anthropology Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Visual Anthropology Review more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Visual Anthropology Review
This network shows the impact of papers published in Visual Anthropology Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Visual Anthropology Review.
About Visual Anthropology Review
The 560 papers published in Visual Anthropology Review in the last decades have received a total of 5.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Visual Anthropology Review usually cover Museology (82 papers), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (107 papers), Geography, Planning and Development (106 papers), Anthropology (112 papers) and Archeology (10 papers) specifically the topics of Geographies of human-animal interactions (102 papers), Photography and Visual Culture (88 papers), Anthropological Studies and Insights (77 papers), Museums and Cultural Heritage (69 papers), Participatory Visual Research Methods (66 papers), Visual Culture and Art Theory (63 papers), Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation (59 papers) and Cinema and Media Studies (36 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Visual Anthropology Review are Stephanie Takaragawa, Mark Allen Peterson, Jay Ruby, Faye Ginsburg, David MacDougall, Elizabeth J. Edwards, Eric Gable, Lisa M. Mitchell, Liam Buckley and Terence S. Turner.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.