Daniel Fabre

63 papers receiving 258 citations

Peers

Daniel Fabre
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Cultural Studies 128
  • Archeology 88
  • History and Philosophy of Science 32
  • Anthropology 44
  • Sociology and Political Science 193
Replace Jean Chevalier with:
Jean Chevalier
Patrick Boucheron France
Jean-Didier Urbain France
H. Glenn Penny United States
Michel Leiris Germany
Michel Baridon France
Pierre Centlivres Switzerland
Peter Kornicki United Kingdom
Yuri Pines Israel
Donald J. Cosentino United States
Daniel Fabre relative to Jean Chevalier Jean Chevalier's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×16×
Jean Chevalier · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Fabre

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Fabre's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Fabre with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Fabre more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Fabre

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Fabre. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Fabre. The network helps show where Daniel Fabre may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Fabre, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Fabre Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Fabre links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 75 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198633
2 198219
3 198718
4 201016
5 198615
6
The Historical Roots of the Fairy Tale
198213
7 201012
8 19859
9 20029
10 20009
11 19869
12 20089
13 20008
14 20018
15 19998
16 19877
17 19917
18 19877
19 19997
20
La vie quotidienne des paysans du Languedoc au XIXe siècle
19736

About Daniel Fabre

Daniel Fabre is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Archeology, Literature and Literary Theory, Anthropology and Cultural Studies, having authored 75 papers that have together received 355 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cultural Identity and Heritage (17 papers), French Urban and Social Studies (15 papers), Diverse Cultural and Historical Studies (10 papers), Historical and Literary Analyses (9 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (7 papers), Linguistics and Discourse Analysis (5 papers), Agriculture and Rural Development Research (4 papers) and Medieval European Literature and History (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cultural Studies (128 citations), Archeology (88 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (32 citations), Anthropology (44 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (193 citations). Daniel Fabre has collaborated with scholars based in France, Italy and Ukraine. Frequent co-authors include Vladimir Propp, Jean Jamin, Jacques Lacroix, Marc Augé, Dominique Blanc, Jean Guilaine, Françoise Zonabend, Jean‐Claude Schmitt, Pierre Centlivres and Denis Chevallier. Their work appears in journals such as Archives de sciences sociales des religions, Clio, L Homme, Ethnologie française and Annales Histoire Sciences Sociales.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact