Team Performance Management

619 papers and 8.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 619 papers published in Team Performance Management in the last decades have received a total of 8.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Team Performance Management usually cover Social Psychology (305 papers), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (219 papers) and Communication (145 papers) specifically the topics of Team Dynamics and Performance (271 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (144 papers) and Knowledge Management and Sharing (128 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Team Performance Management are Judith A. Holton, Hayward P. Andres, Upasna A. Agarwal, Nicholas Clarke, Charles C. Manz, Hakan Erkutlu, E. Lee Rosenthal, Linda M. Peters, Leif Jarle Gressgård and Malcolm Higgs.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Team Performance Management

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Team Performance Management. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Team Performance Management.

Countries where authors publish in Team Performance Management

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Team Performance Management. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Team Performance Management with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Team Performance Management more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025