School Psychology International

1.4k papers and 27.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.4k papers published in School Psychology International in the last decades have received a total of 27.1k indexed citations. Papers published in School Psychology International usually cover Clinical Psychology (641 papers), Education (596 papers) and Social Psychology (500 papers) specifically the topics of Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (440 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (313 papers) and Educational and Psychological Assessments (294 papers). The most active scholars publishing in School Psychology International are E. Scott Huebner, Qing Li, Wendy Craig, Tuncay Ergene, Bruce A. Bracken, Andrew J. Martin, Debra Pepler, Ken Rigby, John H. Hoover and Alex Kozulin.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in School Psychology International

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in School Psychology International. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in School Psychology International.

Countries where authors publish in School Psychology International

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in School Psychology International. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in School Psychology International with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites School Psychology International more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025