School Psychology Quarterly

835 papers and 34.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 835 papers published in School Psychology Quarterly in the last decades have received a total of 34.2k indexed citations. Papers published in School Psychology Quarterly usually cover Developmental and Educational Psychology (398 papers), Clinical Psychology (377 papers) and Education (313 papers) specifically the topics of Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (293 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (228 papers) and Early Childhood Education and Development (162 papers). The most active scholars publishing in School Psychology Quarterly are Christine K. Malecki, Nancy L. Leech, Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie, E. Scott Huebner, Michelle K. Demaray, Thomas R. Kratochwill, Sandra L. Christenson, Clayton R. Cook, Jean A. Baker and Frank M. Gresham.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in School Psychology Quarterly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in School Psychology Quarterly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in School Psychology Quarterly.

Countries where authors publish in School Psychology Quarterly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in School Psychology Quarterly. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in School Psychology Quarterly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites School Psychology Quarterly more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025