The Serials Librarian

7.6k citations
2.0k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • Library Science and Information Literacy
    • Library Collection Development and Digital Resources
    • Web and Library Services
    • Library Science and Information Systems
    • Research Data Management Practices

Papers in

    • Library Science and Information Literacy 224
    • Library Collection Development and Digital Resources 939
    • Library Science and Information Systems 510
    • Web and Library Services 200
    • Research Data Management Practices 112

The Serials Librarian

1.3k papers receiving 5.2k citations

Peers

The Serials Librarian
Comparison fields: 5 of 187
  • Library and Information Sciences 1.4k
  • Information Systems 4.6k
  • Conservation 520
  • History and Philosophy of Science 709
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 889
Replace Journal of the Medical Library Association JMLA with:
Journal of the Medical Library Association JMLA United States
Serials Review United States
Library trends United States
Library journal United States
Learned Publishing United States
The International Information & Library Review United States
Medical Reference Services Quarterly United States
Library Review United Kingdom
Library Hi Tech United States
Reference Services Review United States
The Serials Librarian relative to Journal of the Medical Library Association JMLA United States Journal of the Medical Library Association JMLA's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Journal of the Medical Library Association JMLA · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in The Serials Librarian

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Serials Librarian. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Serials Librarian with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Serials Librarian more than expected).

Fields of papers published in The Serials Librarian

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Serials Librarian. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Serials Librarian.

About The Serials Librarian

The 2.0k papers published in The Serials Librarian in the last decades have received a total of 7.6k indexed citations . Papers published in The Serials Librarian usually cover Library and Information Sciences (274 papers), Information Systems (1.2k papers), Conservation (147 papers), Medical Terminology (9 papers) and History and Philosophy of Science (155 papers) specifically the topics of Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (939 papers), Library Science and Information Systems (510 papers), Library Science and Information Literacy (224 papers), Web and Library Services (200 papers), Publishing and Scholarly Communication (148 papers), Digital and Traditional Archives Management (145 papers), Research Data Management Practices (112 papers) and Mathematics, Computing, and Information Processing (108 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Serials Librarian are Thomas E. Nisonger, Paul Ginsparg, Catherine Rey, Amy Friedlander, Jean‐Pierre V. M. Hérubel, Frances Boyle, Carol Tenopir, Rachel Harrison, Louise F. Spiteri and Francis Narin.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact