The Serials Librarian

1.9k papers and 6.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.9k papers published in The Serials Librarian in the last decades have received a total of 6.2k indexed citations. Papers published in The Serials Librarian usually cover Information Systems (1.2k papers), Library and Information Sciences (270 papers) and History and Philosophy of Science (157 papers) specifically the topics of Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (925 papers), Library Science and Information Systems (502 papers) and Library Science and Information Literacy (222 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Serials Librarian are Thomas E. Nisonger, Paul Ginsparg, Amy Friedlander, Catherine Rey, Roger Schonfeld, Jean‐Pierre V. M. Hérubel, Carol Tenopir, Francis Narin, Louise F. Spiteri and Frances Boyle.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Serials Librarian

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Serials Librarian. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Serials Librarian.

Countries where authors publish in The Serials Librarian

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Serials Librarian. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Serials Librarian with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Serials Librarian more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025