Library Hi Tech

1.9k papers and 17.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.9k papers published in Library Hi Tech in the last decades have received a total of 17.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Library Hi Tech usually cover Information Systems (904 papers), Sociology and Political Science (260 papers) and Library and Information Sciences (243 papers) specifically the topics of Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (274 papers), Web and Library Services (257 papers) and Library Science and Information Literacy (174 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Library Hi Tech are John Price‐Wilkin, Lindsay Glynn, Andrew Booth, Kuo‐Lun Hsiao, Axel Schmetzke, Ina Fourie, Michael Seadle, Denise Dillon, Thomas A. Peters and Dickson K.W. Chiu.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Library Hi Tech

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Library Hi Tech. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Library Hi Tech.

Countries where authors publish in Library Hi Tech

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Library Hi Tech. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Library Hi Tech with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Library Hi Tech more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025