Countries where authors publish in Sexual Development
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Sexual Development. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Sexual Development with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sexual Development more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Sexual Development. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Sexual Development.
About Sexual Development
The 568 papers published in Sexual Development in the last decades have received a total of 14.3k indexed citations . Papers published in Sexual Development usually cover Reproductive Medicine (122 papers), Urology (83 papers), Genetics (396 papers), Physiology (57 papers) and Molecular Biology (335 papers) specifically the topics of Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities (378 papers), Sexual Differentiation and Disorders (264 papers), Sperm and Testicular Function (108 papers), Urological Disorders and Treatments (83 papers), Animal Genetics and Reproduction (70 papers), Reproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species (57 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (47 papers) and Hormonal and reproductive studies (46 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Sexual Development are Ikuo Miura, Jean‐François Baroiller, Hélèna D'Cotta, John C. Avise, Judith E. Mank, Jon J. Amberg, M.S. Sepúlveda, Reuben R. Goforth, Richard R. Behringer and Yoshitaka Nagahama.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.