Seminars in Neuroscience

302 papers and 7.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 302 papers published in Seminars in Neuroscience in the last decades have received a total of 7.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Seminars in Neuroscience usually cover Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (148 papers), Molecular Biology (114 papers) and Cognitive Neuroscience (67 papers) specifically the topics of Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (73 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (35 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (28 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Seminars in Neuroscience are Christof Koch, Francis Crick, George F. Koob, Robert M. Sapolsky, Elisabeth A. Murray, Trevor W. Robbins, Wolfram Schultz, António R. Damásio, Barry J. Everitt and Wendy Suzuki.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Seminars in Neuroscience

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Seminars in Neuroscience. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Seminars in Neuroscience.

Countries where authors publish in Seminars in Neuroscience

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Seminars in Neuroscience. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Seminars in Neuroscience with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Seminars in Neuroscience more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025