Collection Building

545 papers and 3.0k indexed citations

About

The 545 papers published in Collection Building in the last decades have received a total of 3.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Collection Building usually cover Information Systems (288 papers), Library and Information Sciences (195 papers) and History and Philosophy of Science (63 papers) specifically the topics of Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (242 papers), Library Science and Information Literacy (139 papers) and Library Science and Administration (108 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Collection Building are Michael Levine‐Clark, Kanwal Ameen, Linda Ashcroft, Gary W. White, Thomas E. Nisonger, Constant Okello‐Obura, Michael Bowman, Mohammadamin Erfanmanesh, M. Sara Lowe and Kay Ann Cassell.

In The Last Decade

Collection Building

427 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Fields of papers published in Collection Building

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Collection Building. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Collection Building.

Countries where authors publish in Collection Building

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Collection Building. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Collection Building with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Collection Building more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026