Revue de l histoire des religions

743 papers and 895 indexed citations i.

About

The 743 papers published in Revue de l histoire des religions in the last decades have received a total of 895 indexed citations. Papers published in Revue de l histoire des religions usually cover Anthropology (269 papers), Archeology (263 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (138 papers) specifically the topics of Classical Antiquity Studies (147 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (113 papers) and Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (96 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Revue de l histoire des religions are Antoine Guillaumont, Jean‐Paul Roux, Dominique Briquel, Marcel Détienne, Robert Turcan, Alberto Bernabé, Daniel Dubuisson, Jean-Pierre Vernant, Claude Calame and Philippe Borgeaud.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Revue de l histoire des religions

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Revue de l histoire des religions. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Revue de l histoire des religions.

Countries where authors publish in Revue de l histoire des religions

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Revue de l histoire des religions. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Revue de l histoire des religions with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Revue de l histoire des religions more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025