This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Saeculum. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Saeculum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Saeculum more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Saeculum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Saeculum.
About Saeculum
The 688 papers published in Saeculum in the last decades have received a total of 2.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Saeculum usually cover Classics (135 papers), History (149 papers), Religious studies (69 papers), Anthropology (112 papers) and Archeology (101 papers) specifically the topics of Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies (76 papers), Eurasian Exchange Networks (60 papers), Byzantine Studies and History (59 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (46 papers), Chinese history and philosophy (44 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (43 papers), Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (37 papers) and Religion, Theology, and Education (37 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Saeculum are Johannes Spörl, Karl W. Butzer, Hans‐Joachim Gehrke, Peter Richard Schreiner, Hermann Strasburger, Hartmann Tyrell, Gerd Steiner, Bertold Spuler, Arnold Angenendt and Robert Heine‐Geldern.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.