Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies

6.0k citations
953 papers · · active since 2016

Impact in

    • Classical Antiquity Studies
    • Historical and Literary Studies
  • Archeology top 2%
    • Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies
    • Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History
    • Archaeology and Historical Studies
    • Ancient Near East History

Papers in

    • Classical Antiquity Studies 569
    • Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies 181
    • Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History 64
    • Ancient Near East History 60

Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies

557 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Peers

Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies
Comparison fields: 5 of 127
  • Anthropology 4.0k
  • Archeology 2.6k
  • Classics 945
  • Philosophy 1.6k
  • Religious studies 292
Replace Greece and Rome with:
Greece and Rome United Kingdom
Harvard Studies in Classical Philology United States
Transactions of the American Philological Association (1974-) United States
Die Welt des Islams United States
The Classical Review United Kingdom
Oriens United States
Studia Islamica France
Greek, Roman and Byzantine studies United States
Numen United States
Philologus Germany
Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies relative to Greece and Rome United Kingdom Greece and Rome's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Greece and Rome · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies.

About Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies

The 953 papers published in Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies in the last decades have received a total of 6.0k indexed citations . Papers published in Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies usually cover Anthropology (589 papers), Archeology (295 papers), Classics (79 papers), Philosophy (213 papers) and Language and Linguistics (67 papers) specifically the topics of Classical Antiquity Studies (569 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (198 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (181 papers), Byzantine Studies and History (71 papers), Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History (64 papers), Organic Chemistry Synthesis Methods (61 papers), Ancient Near East History (60 papers) and Linguistics and language evolution (58 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies are Nicholas Horsfall, E. Courtney, A. A. Long, Myles F. Burnyeat, David John Furley, Heinrich von Staden, Michael Frede, Malcolm Davies, Edith Hall and John N. Adams.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact