Res Anthropology and Aesthetics

544 papers and 2.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 544 papers published in Res Anthropology and Aesthetics in the last decades have received a total of 2.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Res Anthropology and Aesthetics usually cover Visual Arts and Performing Arts (150 papers), Anthropology (118 papers) and Archeology (88 papers) specifically the topics of Latin American history and culture (68 papers), Visual Culture and Art Theory (38 papers) and Anthropological Studies and Insights (36 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Res Anthropology and Aesthetics are William Pietz, Karl Taube, Marshall Sahlins, Bruno Latour, David Stuart, Rosemary A. Joyce, Stephen Houston, Catherine J. Allen, John Monaghan and Uri Almagor.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Res Anthropology and Aesthetics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Res Anthropology and Aesthetics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Res Anthropology and Aesthetics.

Countries where authors publish in Res Anthropology and Aesthetics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Res Anthropology and Aesthetics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Res Anthropology and Aesthetics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Res Anthropology and Aesthetics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025