Reviews in the Neurosciences

1.2k papers and 39.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.2k papers published in Reviews in the Neurosciences in the last decades have received a total of 39.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Reviews in the Neurosciences usually cover Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (461 papers), Cognitive Neuroscience (371 papers) and Molecular Biology (279 papers) specifically the topics of Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (240 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (129 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (107 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Reviews in the Neurosciences are Elizabeth A. Kensinger, Anders M. Fjell, Cheryl D. Conrad, Kristine B. Walhovd, Thérèse Di Paolo, Hojjat Adeli, Nima Rezaei, David Sander, Jordan Grafman and Tiziana Zalla.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Reviews in the Neurosciences

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Reviews in the Neurosciences. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Reviews in the Neurosciences.

Countries where authors publish in Reviews in the Neurosciences

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Reviews in the Neurosciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Reviews in the Neurosciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Reviews in the Neurosciences more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025