This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Redox Report. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Redox Report with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Redox Report more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Redox Report. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Redox Report.
About Redox Report
The 1.3k papers published in Redox Report in the last decades have received a total of 33.4k indexed citations . Papers published in Redox Report usually cover Biochemistry (132 papers), Biochemistry (84 papers), Biological Psychiatry (26 papers), Biophysics (52 papers) and Clinical Biochemistry (57 papers) specifically the topics of Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress (106 papers), Free Radicals and Antioxidants (104 papers), Vitamin C and Antioxidants Research (79 papers), Redox biology and oxidative stress (78 papers), Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (71 papers), Genomics, phytochemicals, and oxidative stress (60 papers), Electron Spin Resonance Studies (49 papers) and Neutrophil, Myeloperoxidase and Oxidative Mechanisms (48 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Redox Report are Willem H. Koppenol, Anthony J. Kettle, Christine C. Winterbourn, Shinya Toyokuni, Thomas G. Cotter, Ulf T. Brunk, Junichi Fujii, Yoshitaka Ikeda, Catherine Rice‐Evans and Daniele Del Rio.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.