Medicinal Research Reviews

1.5k papers and 108.7k indexed citations

About

The 1.5k papers published in Medicinal Research Reviews in the last decades have received a total of 108.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Medicinal Research Reviews usually cover Molecular Biology (797 papers), Oncology (223 papers) and Organic Chemistry (214 papers) specifically the topics of Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (83 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (82 papers) and Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (56 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Medicinal Research Reviews are Erik De Clercq, Claudiu T. Supuran, Andrea Scozzafava, Kuo‐Hsiung Lee, Angela Casini, Susan L. Morris‐Natschke, Kailash C. Agarwal, Christopher K. Glass, Longqin Hu and Binghe Wang.

In The Last Decade

Medicinal Research Reviews

1.4k papers receiving 105.9k citations

Fields of papers published in Medicinal Research Reviews

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Medicinal Research Reviews. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Medicinal Research Reviews.

Countries where authors publish in Medicinal Research Reviews

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Medicinal Research Reviews. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Medicinal Research Reviews with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Medicinal Research Reviews more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026