Medical Care Research and Review

1.2k papers and 42.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.2k papers published in Medical Care Research and Review in the last decades have received a total of 42.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Medical Care Research and Review usually cover General Health Professions (893 papers), Economics and Econometrics (753 papers) and Emergency Medical Services (84 papers) specifically the topics of Healthcare Policy and Management (683 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (389 papers) and Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (234 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Medical Care Research and Review are Glenn Flores, Cindy Brach, Jack Hadley, Nicholas G. Castle, Judith H. Hibbard, Todd H. Wagner, Aman Bhandari, Thomas A. LaVeist, Louise Lemieux‐Charles and Bryan J. Weiner.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Medical Care Research and Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Medical Care Research and Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Medical Care Research and Review.

Countries where authors publish in Medical Care Research and Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Medical Care Research and Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Medical Care Research and Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Medical Care Research and Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025