Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences · 1×
×1.51k/956BIOCH
×0.92k/3kCR
×1.010k/10kMB
×0.94k/4kPHYSI
×0.52k/3kEDM
Citations per year
'16
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24
'25
'26
Countries where authors publish in PPAR Research
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in PPAR Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in PPAR Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites PPAR Research more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in PPAR Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in PPAR Research.
About PPAR Research
The 654 papers published in PPAR Research in the last decades have received a total of 20.2k indexed citations . Papers published in PPAR Research usually cover Biochemistry (78 papers), Cancer Research (137 papers), Molecular Biology (558 papers), Physiology (162 papers) and Pharmacology (59 papers) specifically the topics of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors (509 papers), Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (140 papers), Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer (124 papers), Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism (75 papers), Eicosanoids and Hypertension Pharmacology (58 papers), Inflammatory mediators and NSAID effects (53 papers), Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (43 papers) and Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases (41 papers). The most active scholars publishing in PPAR Research are Sander Kersten, Michael Müller, Maryam Rakhshandehroo, Bianca Knoch, Andrea Galli, Guangrui Yang, John Y.L. Chiang, Tiangang Li, Lihong Chen and John B. Bruning.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.