Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences

665 papers and 35.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 665 papers published in Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences in the last decades have received a total of 35.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences usually cover Molecular Biology (206 papers), Physiology (101 papers) and Surgery (85 papers) specifically the topics of Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control (46 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (25 papers) and Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (25 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences are John B. Whitfield, Thomas W. Clarkson, Kimber L. Stanhope, James D. Faix, Giuseppe Lippi, Herman Adlercreutz, José M. Estrela, Ángel Ortega, Eugene K. Harris and Elena Obrador.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences.

Countries where authors publish in Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025