Planning Perspectives

1.2k papers and 7.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.2k papers published in Planning Perspectives in the last decades have received a total of 7.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Planning Perspectives usually cover Urban Studies (397 papers), Sociology and Political Science (290 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (198 papers) specifically the topics of Urbanization and City Planning (222 papers), Urban Planning and Governance (152 papers) and Urban and Rural Development Challenges (69 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Planning Perspectives are André Sørensen, Lucy E. Hewitt, Ambe J. Njoh, Stephen Essex, Brian Chalkley, Ceri Peach, Javier Monclús, Robert Home, Liora Bigon and Carlos Nunes Silva.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Planning Perspectives

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Planning Perspectives. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Planning Perspectives.

Countries where authors publish in Planning Perspectives

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Planning Perspectives. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Planning Perspectives with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Planning Perspectives more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025