Planning Practice and Research

1.1k papers and 14.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.1k papers published in Planning Practice and Research in the last decades have received a total of 14.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Planning Practice and Research usually cover Urban Studies (393 papers), Sociology and Political Science (212 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (181 papers) specifically the topics of Urban Planning and Governance (259 papers), Urbanization and City Planning (142 papers) and Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (132 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Planning Practice and Research are John Warwick Montgomery, Luca Bertolini, Andreas Faludi, Simin Davoudi, Vincent Nadin, U. Janin Rivolin, Claire Colomb, Jennifer Evans-Cowley, Nick Gallent and Franco Bianchini.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Planning Practice and Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Planning Practice and Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Planning Practice and Research.

Countries where authors publish in Planning Practice and Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Planning Practice and Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Planning Practice and Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Planning Practice and Research more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025