Practical assessment, research & evaluation

21.5k citations
414 papers · · active since 1996

Impact in

Papers in

Practical assessment, research & evaluation

345 papers receiving 16.7k citations

Peers

Practical assessment, research & evaluation
Comparison fields: 5 of 228
  • Management Science and Operations Research 2.1k
  • Education 4.5k
  • Social Psychology 1.5k
  • Clinical Psychology 1.4k
  • Computer Science Applications 351
Replace Journal of Mixed Methods Research with:
Journal of Mixed Methods Research United States
International Journal of Testing United States
International Journal of Medical Education United States
Communication Methods and Measures United States
Methodology United States
The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods United Kingdom
Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science United States
Human Resource Development Review United States
European Review of Social Psychology United States
Measurement Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives United States
Practical assessment, research & evaluation relative to Journal of Mixed Methods Research United States Journal of Mixed Methods Research's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Journal of Mixed Methods Research · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Practical assessment, research & evaluation

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Practical assessment, research & evaluation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Practical assessment, research & evaluation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Practical assessment, research & evaluation more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Practical assessment, research & evaluation

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Practical assessment, research & evaluation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Practical assessment, research & evaluation.

About Practical assessment, research & evaluation

The 414 papers published in Practical assessment, research & evaluation in the last decades have received a total of 21.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Practical assessment, research & evaluation usually cover Management Science and Operations Research (183 papers), Statistics and Probability (69 papers), Education (165 papers), Information Systems and Management (37 papers) and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (22 papers) specifically the topics of Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (167 papers), Student Assessment and Feedback (65 papers), Educational Assessment and Pedagogy (50 papers), Educational Assessment and Improvement (35 papers), Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (30 papers), Teacher Education and Assessments (21 papers), Evaluation of Teaching Practices (20 papers) and Advanced Causal Inference Techniques (18 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Practical assessment, research & evaluation are Jason W. Osborne, Lawrence M. Rudner, William D. Schafer, Brian A. Sandford, Chia-Chien Hsu, Joost de Winter, Dimitra Dodou, Steven E. Stemler, Justus Randolph and Bruno D. Zumbo.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact