European Review of Social Psychology

339 papers and 32.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 339 papers published in European Review of Social Psychology in the last decades have received a total of 32.5k indexed citations. Papers published in European Review of Social Psychology usually cover Sociology and Political Science (254 papers), Social Psychology (225 papers) and Cognitive Neuroscience (71 papers) specifically the topics of Social and Intergroup Psychology (222 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (159 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (57 papers). The most active scholars publishing in European Review of Social Psychology are Paschal Sheeran, Michael A. Hogg, Peter M. Gollwitzer, Naomi Ellemers, Gerd Gigerenzer, Icek Ajzen, Martin Fishbein, Henk Aarts, Guido Peeters and Janusz Czapiński.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in European Review of Social Psychology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in European Review of Social Psychology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in European Review of Social Psychology.

Countries where authors publish in European Review of Social Psychology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in European Review of Social Psychology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in European Review of Social Psychology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites European Review of Social Psychology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025