Pacific Conservation Biology

1.2k papers and 17.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.2k papers published in Pacific Conservation Biology in the last decades have received a total of 17.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Pacific Conservation Biology usually cover Ecology (781 papers), Nature and Landscape Conservation (397 papers) and Global and Planetary Change (279 papers) specifically the topics of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (455 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (241 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (219 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Pacific Conservation Biology are Mike Calver, Harry F. Recher, Hamish McCallum, Graham R. Fulton, Richard J. Hobbs, David B. Lindenmayer, Jonathan Majer, Scott Burnett, Daniel Lunney and Karen Firestone.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Pacific Conservation Biology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Pacific Conservation Biology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Pacific Conservation Biology.

Countries where authors publish in Pacific Conservation Biology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Pacific Conservation Biology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Pacific Conservation Biology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pacific Conservation Biology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025