This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Mycobiology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Mycobiology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mycobiology more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Mycobiology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Mycobiology.
About Mycobiology
The 1.3k papers published in Mycobiology in the last decades have received a total of 19.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Mycobiology usually cover Cell Biology (428 papers), Pharmacology (294 papers), Plant Science (411 papers), Insect Science (98 papers) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (162 papers) specifically the topics of Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (425 papers), Fungal Biology and Applications (227 papers), Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (209 papers), Fungal and yeast genetics research (117 papers), Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (78 papers), Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (77 papers), Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies (77 papers) and Lichen and fungal ecology (76 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Mycobiology are Ki Deok Kim, Youn Su Lee, Mohamed Mannaa, Hyang Burm Lee, Kabir Lamsal, Ahn-Heum Eom, Yun Seok Kim, Sang-Woo Kim, Jeong‐Dong Kim and Jin Hee Jung.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.