American annals of the deaf

1.5k papers and 17.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.5k papers published in American annals of the deaf in the last decades have received a total of 17.0k indexed citations. Papers published in American annals of the deaf usually cover Developmental and Educational Psychology (1.2k papers), Language and Linguistics (401 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (281 papers) specifically the topics of Hearing Impairment and Communication (1.2k papers), Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport (246 papers) and Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (223 papers). The most active scholars publishing in American annals of the deaf are John L. Luckner, Thomas N. Kluwin, Manfred Hintermair, Susan R. Easterbrooks, Barbara Luetke-Stahlman, McCay Vernon, Ye Wang, Mark T. Greenberg, Paul Miller and Yael Bat‐Chava.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in American annals of the deaf

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in American annals of the deaf. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in American annals of the deaf.

Countries where authors publish in American annals of the deaf

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in American annals of the deaf. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in American annals of the deaf with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites American annals of the deaf more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025