College Teaching

1.3k papers and 15.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.3k papers published in College Teaching in the last decades have received a total of 15.0k indexed citations. Papers published in College Teaching usually cover Education (768 papers), Developmental and Educational Psychology (198 papers) and Social Psychology (187 papers) specifically the topics of Evaluation of Teaching Practices (224 papers), Online and Blended Learning (199 papers) and Reflective Practices in Education (141 papers). The most active scholars publishing in College Teaching are Alison King, Anthony F. Grasha, Tim van Gelder, Richard M. Felder, Rebecca Brent, Randy Garner, Steven A. Meyers, Joel Michael, Kellah M. Edens and Deborah R. Tindell.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in College Teaching

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in College Teaching. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in College Teaching.

Countries where authors publish in College Teaching

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in College Teaching. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in College Teaching with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites College Teaching more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025