Countries where authors publish in Open Mathematics
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Open Mathematics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Open Mathematics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Open Mathematics more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Open Mathematics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Open Mathematics.
About Open Mathematics
The 1.6k papers published in Open Mathematics in the last decades have received a total of 10.3k indexed citations . Papers published in Open Mathematics usually cover Algebra and Number Theory (310 papers), Geometry and Topology (560 papers), Applied Mathematics (620 papers), Mathematical Physics (421 papers) and Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (129 papers) specifically the topics of Nonlinear Differential Equations Analysis (147 papers), Advanced Topics in Algebra (139 papers), Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (107 papers), Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering (102 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (94 papers), Differential Equations and Numerical Methods (92 papers), Fractional Differential Equations Solutions (91 papers) and Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations (88 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Open Mathematics are Dietrich Burde, Dumitru Bǎleanu, Ahmed Alsaedi, Abdon Atangana, Yu‐Ming Chu, Bayram Şahin, Emanuel Guariglia, Hacı Mehmet Başkonuş, Hasan Bulut and Nazım I. Mahmudov.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.