Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology · 1×
×1.3532/401BIOCH
×0.41k/3kFS
×0.22k/11kPS
×0.4848/2kND
×0.7220/318FORES
Citations per year
'16
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24
'25
'26
Countries where authors publish in OCL
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in OCL. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in OCL with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites OCL more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in OCL. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in OCL.
About OCL
The 563 papers published in OCL in the last decades have received a total of 7.3k indexed citations . Papers published in OCL usually cover Biochemistry (49 papers), Nutrition and Dietetics (104 papers), Horticulture (6 papers), Forestry (23 papers) and Food Science (103 papers) specifically the topics of Edible Oils Quality and Analysis (83 papers), Fatty Acid Research and Health (55 papers), Sunflower and Safflower Cultivation (47 papers), Food Chemistry and Fat Analysis (40 papers), Nitrogen and Sulfur Effects on Brassica (33 papers), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (33 papers), Lipid metabolism and biosynthesis (32 papers) and Biodiesel Production and Applications (32 papers). The most active scholars publishing in OCL are Patrick Carré, Colin Ratledge, Félicity Vear, Frederick L. Stoddard, C.L.M. de Visser, Philippe Debaeke, Hamdy A. Zahran, Nicolas Langlade, Jean‐Marc Nicaud and France Thévenieau.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.