Countries where authors publish in Ochsner Journal
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Ochsner Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Ochsner Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ochsner Journal more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Ochsner Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Ochsner Journal.
About Ochsner Journal
The 423 papers published in Ochsner Journal in the last decades have received a total of 2.4k indexed citations . Papers published in Ochsner Journal usually cover Family Practice (7 papers), Surgery (147 papers), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (16 papers), Internal Medicine (10 papers) and Emergency Medicine (22 papers) specifically the topics of Anesthesia and Pain Management (17 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (12 papers), Shoulder Injury and Treatment (12 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (11 papers), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (10 papers), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (10 papers), Sports injuries and prevention (10 papers) and Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (9 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Ochsner Journal are Bruce G. Gordon, Renée V. Gardner, Priyanshi Ritwik, Michael G. White, Lydia Bazzano, Avinash K. Shetty, Pat F. Bass, Joseph Biggio, Andrew Steven and M Dietrich.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.