Countries where authors publish in Biological Control
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Biological Control. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Biological Control with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Biological Control more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Biological Control. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Biological Control.
About Biological Control
The 5.2k papers published in Biological Control in the last decades have received a total of 172.3k indexed citations . Papers published in Biological Control usually cover Insect Science (3.6k papers), Plant Science (3.1k papers), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (1.2k papers), Cell Biology (722 papers) and Horticulture (26 papers) specifically the topics of Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (2.0k papers), Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity (969 papers), Biological Control of Invasive Species (912 papers), Entomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest Control (814 papers), Plant and animal studies (768 papers), Insect Pest Control Strategies (744 papers), Insect Resistance and Genetics (730 papers) and Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (721 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Biological Control are Stephen P. Wraight, Felix Wäckers, William E. Snyder, S. D. Wratten, Harry K. Kaya, Marcos Faria, George E. Heimpel, J. P. Michaud, Lawrence A. Lacey and S. Bradleigh Vinson.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.