Countries where authors publish in National Tax Journal
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in National Tax Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in National Tax Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Tax Journal more than expected).
Fields of papers published in National Tax Journal
This network shows the impact of papers published in National Tax Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in National Tax Journal.
About National Tax Journal
The 2.6k papers published in National Tax Journal in the last decades have received a total of 47.3k indexed citations . Papers published in National Tax Journal usually cover Accounting (1.5k papers), Economics and Econometrics (2.1k papers), Gender Studies (494 papers), Political Science and International Relations (592 papers) and Demography (96 papers) specifically the topics of Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (1.4k papers), Corporate Taxation and Avoidance (1.1k papers), Taxation and Compliance Studies (903 papers), Local Government Finance and Decentralization (538 papers), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (494 papers), Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis (331 papers), Taxation and Legal Issues (265 papers) and Housing Market and Economics (240 papers). The most active scholars publishing in National Tax Journal are Joel Slemrod, John D. Wilson, Wallace E. Oates, James M. Poterba, Michael J. Brennan, Jane G. Gravelle, James Alm, Kimberly A. Clausing, Helen F. Ladd and Agnar Sandmo.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.