Countries where authors publish in Natural Product Reports
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Natural Product Reports. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Natural Product Reports with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natural Product Reports more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Natural Product Reports
This network shows the impact of papers published in Natural Product Reports. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Natural Product Reports.
About Natural Product Reports
The 2.2k papers published in Natural Product Reports in the last decades have received a total of 210k indexed citations . Papers published in Natural Product Reports usually cover Pharmacology (885 papers), Biotechnology (145 papers), Pharmacology (169 papers), Molecular Biology (916 papers) and Cancer Research (160 papers) specifically the topics of Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (834 papers), Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis (212 papers), Alkaloids: synthesis and pharmacology (158 papers), Bioactive natural compounds (158 papers), Marine Sponges and Natural Products (130 papers), Bioactive Natural Diterpenoids Research (121 papers), Advanced Synthetic Organic Chemistry (119 papers) and Synthesis and bioactivity of alkaloids (97 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Natural Product Reports are Joseph P. Michael, D. John Faulkner, Zhong Jin, Brent R. Copp, David O’Hagan, Michèle R. Prinsep, Mark S. Butler, James R. Hanson, Braulio M. Fraga and Jeroen S. Dickschat.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.